• Curaçao Chronicle
  • (599-9) 523-4857

Questions Remain Over U.S. Military Operations at Hato Airport Beyond Drug Surveillance Agreement

Local, The Netherlands, United States, | By Correspondent October 14, 2026

 

THE HAGUE – The Dutch government's plan to extend American counternarcotics operations from Curaçao's Hato International Airport until November 2031 has brought renewed attention to the legal arrangements governing other U.S. military activities conducted from the island.

Although the existing agreement between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United States specifically authorizes unarmed surveillance flights related to drug trafficking, Hato Airport has also been used in connection with other American operations.

According to information previously provided by the American consul, Curaçao served as a logistical base for a U.S. humanitarian assistance operation following earthquakes in Venezuela.

American military aircraft were involved in that operation, which reportedly took place with the cooperation of both the Netherlands and Curaçao.

However, the counternarcotics agreement, originally signed in 2000, is specifically intended to facilitate operations against international drug trafficking.

It does not itself establish a general authorization for American military activities unrelated to counternarcotics surveillance.

The distinction has raised questions about the legal arrangements under which other U.S. operations may be conducted from Hato.

The Dutch government's October 12 report announcing preparations for a five-year extension does not explain which separate agreements or authorizations apply to military activities outside the scope of the existing counternarcotics treaty.

The report confirms that the government intends to continue the agreement until November 2, 2031, emphasizing that the authorized flights are unarmed.

The planned extension comes against the background of increased American military activity in the Caribbean and controversy over U.S. strikes against suspected drug-smuggling vessels.

The Dutch government has repeatedly emphasized that the Kingdom was not involved in those attacks.

Nevertheless, the American presence at Hato remains a matter of public interest because the airport serves both civilian aviation and security-related operations.

Curaçao Prime Minister Gilmar Pisas has previously supported the continuation of the American presence, citing the importance of regional security and cooperation against drug trafficking.

The question of oversight is also relevant to the formal extension procedure.

Under the Kingdom Act on the Approval and Publication of Treaties, the Dutch government must notify the Parliaments of Curaçao and Aruba of its intention to extend the agreement.

Within 30 days of formal notification, a request for parliamentary approval may be submitted by authorized representatives, including at least 30 members of the Dutch House of Representatives or Curaçao's Minister Plenipotentiary.

Such a request would require the proposed extension to undergo a parliamentary approval procedure rather than proceeding without that additional step.

The October 12 report does not indicate when the Parliaments of Curaçao and Aruba were informed about the planned renewal.

The absence of that information leaves unanswered questions about the timetable for parliamentary scrutiny and the opportunity for representatives of the Caribbean countries to examine the extension.

With the agreement potentially remaining in force for another five years, the issue extends beyond the continuation of drug surveillance flights.

It also concerns transparency about the legal basis for American operations from Curaçao, the limits of the existing agreement and the role of the island's elected representatives in overseeing arrangements that affect its territory.

+