WILLEMSTAD – King Momo was burned a day later than usual this year, following strong public criticism of an earlier decision to cancel the traditional ritual. Carnival organizer Beehives BV ultimately opted for a delayed burning, held last night at 9:00 p.m. near Rif, in order to symbolically close the carnival season. However, the controversy surrounding the handling of the event has not subsided.
For the first time in decades, the burning of Momo did not take place immediately after the farewell parade. According to those involved, the decision was made because the effigy of Momo was said to bear too strong a resemblance to Shon Benchi, a living individual. This explanation sparked widespread criticism, as the burning of Momo has been regarded since the 1950s as the fixed ritual conclusion of Carnival on Curaçao.
The absence of the ritual led to public outrage, with many questioning both the decision-making process and the communication surrounding it. Following mounting pressure from the public and various stakeholders, Beehives BV announced that Momo would still be burned, albeit one day later. The late ceremony formally brought the carnival period to an end.
Critics, however, argue that the delayed burning was primarily intended to limit reputational damage rather than to uphold tradition. In a brief statement, Beehives referred to “circumstances and challenges” that led to the change in plans, without explicitly addressing the original reason for postponing the ritual.
The episode has triggered broader debate about transparency, cultural sensitivity, and governance within Carnival organization. While the symbolic closing of Carnival has now taken place, questions remain about how decisions of such cultural significance are made and communicated, and whether greater clarity and consultation are needed in the future to avoid similar controversies.