A dignified life, but why not a dignified death?

The pursuit of a dignified life is universal and deeply human, dating back to the dawn of humanity millions of years ago. Dignity, a cornerstone of human rights, ensures that every individual is treated with compassion, respect, and consideration for their choices, allowing them to reach their full potential. 

While there is little debate about the importance of living with dignity, the concept of choosing a dignified death remains taboo. Death occurs when life ends, but this discussion extends beyond the act of dying to the period preceding it—when suffering from terminal illness, excruciating pain, or medically confirmed incurable conditions strips individuals of their humanity. This phase leading up to death is still part of life. 

Dying with dignity, known as euthanasia, derives from the Greek words eu (good) and thanatos (death). To break the stigma, we must bring this topic into open discussion. As populations age and cases of terminal illnesses increase, the need for a compassionate approach to end-of-life decisions grows. 

During my time as a parliamentarian, I sought to address this issue but faced significant resistance. I learned that progressive ideas often struggle to gain traction in the political arena. Opponents, particularly deeply religious groups, argue that a divine being determines life and death, even amid profound human suffering. They advocate for faith in miracles—defined as extraordinary events without scientific basis. But the question remains: how long should one endure pain and an undignified existence while waiting for a miracle? 

Others place their trust in technology to prolong life. While medical advancements continue to evolve, they cannot answer the pressing question: should life be extended when it is no longer humane or dignified? The answer to this question should lie with the individual, supported by their family and guided by medical advice. 

Euthanasia takes various forms, generally categorized as passive (refusing medical or technological interventions) or active (providing assistance for a peaceful death, such as administering medication). In this decade alone, more countries have legalized euthanasia than in all previous decades combined. 

The time has come to ask ourselves: are we mature enough for a rational, non-emotional dialogue about the right to die with dignity?  

Alex David Rosaria (53) is a freelance consultant active in Asia & Pacific. He is a former Member of Parliament, Minister of Economic Affairs, State Secretary of Finance and UN Implementation Officer in Africa and Central America. He’s from Curaçao and has a MBA from the University of Iowa. (USA). 




Share