WILLEMSTAD - Between social pressure and legal principles, Curaçao’s justice system faces a growing question: how should punishment relate to humanity? That dilemma was at the heart of the latest episode of the podcast “Hustisia, Seguridad i Abo” (“Justice, Security and You”), in which judge Sigmar Carmelia discussed the island’s approach to life imprisonment and sentence review.

The discussion focused on how Curaçao deals with prisoners serving life sentences — and whether there should be room for rehabilitation and reintegration.

Since 2011, prisoners in Curaçao, Aruba, and Sint Maarten can apply for a review of their sentence after twenty years in detention. According to Carmelia, it is crucial that even convicted offenders retain a sense of perspective and hope.

“We should never downplay the seriousness of a crime,” Carmelia said, “but there must always be an opportunity for someone to redeem themselves and return to society.”

The judge emphasized that justice is not solely about punishment or retribution but also about understanding and restoration. Victims deserve recognition and justice, she said, but long-term inmates should also be given a chance to rebuild their lives.

“If the door is closed completely, the possibility of improvement disappears,” Carmelia explained.

The podcast also delved into the emotional dimension of sentencing. While some argue that harsh penalties are necessary for serious crimes, the episode highlighted that each case has its own context — and that social background, trauma, or desperation often play a role in criminal behavior.

“It’s not about pity,” Carmelia concluded, “it’s about humanity. Those who have served their time should not be condemned forever. Rehabilitation is a right, just like justice is.”

The episode has sparked renewed debate on the island about the balance between punishment and compassion — and whether Curaçao’s justice system can evolve to reflect both.